Ange Postecoglou’s Tottenham suffered a shocking 3-2 defeat to Brighton after leading 2-0 at halftime. This collapse has reignited doubts about “Angeball” and sparked speculation about potential replacements.
The article suggests Tottenham under Postecoglou have become even more “Spurs-like” – capable of brilliant performances but also prone to spectacular collapses. The recent 3-0 win at Manchester United followed by this Brighton defeat exemplifies this inconsistency.
While “Ange out” talk is still quiet, the article speculates it could grow louder during the international break. It presents odds on potential replacements:
1. Graham Potter (former Chelsea manager) is the favorite
2. Roberto De Zerbi (Brighton manager)
3. Marco Silva (Fulham manager)
4. Thomas Tuchel (former Chelsea manager)
5. Jose Mourinho, Eddie Howe, Julian Nagelsmann, and Thomas Frank (tied)
9. Julen Lopetegui and Gareth Southgate (tied)
The article suggests Potter is the most likely candidate, noting it’s “about time Spurs had another former Chelsea boss in charge.” It also mentions that Potter previously turned down Spurs but might be more interested now.
Other candidates are analyzed briefly:
– De Zerbi is appealing but unlikely in the short term
– Silva deserves consideration for his work at Fulham
– Tuchel could satisfy Daniel Levy’s “big-club delusions” but may prefer Man United
– Mourinho would represent a dramatic shift from Postecoglou’s style
– Southgate would bring stability but less excitement
The article emphasizes Tottenham’s pattern of making dramatic managerial changes, often seeking the opposite of their current manager. It suggests Levy might desire a more “serious” approach after Postecoglou’s high-risk, high-reward style.
Overall, the piece is speculative and somewhat tongue-in-cheek, playing on Tottenham’s reputation for inconsistency and managerial turmoil. It acknowledges that while Postecoglou isn’t in immediate danger, the nature of football and Spurs’ history means his position could quickly become precarious if results don’t improve.
The article concludes by noting that Postecoglou’s situation at Tottenham is still far from critical, but the nature of modern football and Spurs’ history means things can change quickly. It suggests that while the current “Ange out” talk is minimal, it could grow if Tottenham’s performances continue to be inconsistent.
The piece also touches on the broader context of Tottenham’s managerial history. It mentions that the club has cycled through various types of managers in recent years, from elite appointments who seemed to view the job as beneath them, to wild gambles and desperate choices. This pattern is presented as part of the reason why speculating about Postecoglou’s replacement, even this early in his tenure, isn’t entirely far-fetched.
The article’s tone is largely satirical, poking fun at Tottenham’s reputation for unpredictability and the fickle nature of football fandom and management. It plays on the idea that Spurs are always just one bad result away from a crisis, regardless of their recent form or the overall trajectory of the team.
Ultimately, the piece serves more as a commentary on the volatile nature of Premier League management and Tottenham’s particular brand of chaos than a serious prediction of Postecoglou’s imminent departure. It highlights how quickly narratives can shift in football and how even successful managers are never far from scrutiny.
