Tottenham Hotspur’s ongoing struggles on the pitch have led many to point the finger at the club’s ownership, with legendary Arsenal striker Ian Wright being one of the most vocal critics of Daniel Levy’s tenure as Spurs chairman. Wright has claimed that if Tottenham are to have any hope of future success, they must move on from Levy. The club’s current form, sitting in a disappointing 15th place in the Premier League after a dire run of just one point from their last seven games, has fueled the debate about what needs to change for Tottenham to return to competitiveness at the top level.
The concerns about Levy’s impact on the club’s fortunes are not new, but Wright’s comments bring a fresh perspective on the matter. While Levy has been praised for his business acumen, particularly in terms of the financial management and commercial side of the club, Wright argues that this expertise has not translated into on-field success. Tottenham have endured a prolonged period of underachievement despite having one of the most prolific goalscorers in English football history in Harry Kane. The striker, who came through Spurs’ youth ranks and became their talisman, has won multiple Premier League Golden Boots, yet the club has failed to win any major trophies during his time there.
Wright expressed his frustration about the club’s lack of success despite having such a player, pointing out that Levy failed to build a team around Kane that could challenge for silverware. While Kane’s individual performances have been remarkable, Wright believes that the club’s inability to capitalize on his talent and surround him with the necessary support has been a key factor in their continued failure. Kane’s numerous Golden Boots should have been a sign that Tottenham had a player capable of leading them to success, yet the club has not been able to translate that individual brilliance into team achievements.
The fact that Tottenham has failed to win major trophies despite having one of the best strikers in the league, coupled with their recent poor form, has led to growing disillusionment among the fanbase. Many supporters have pointed to the lack of investment in the squad, particularly in key areas such as defense and midfield, as a reason for the club’s continued failure. The club’s inability to keep pace with other Premier League giants in terms of squad depth and quality has been a recurring issue under Levy’s leadership.
For Wright, the solution is clear: Tottenham needs new ownership if they are to compete with the top clubs in English football. He believes that Levy’s focus on running the club as a business rather than prioritizing success on the pitch has held Tottenham back. Wright’s comments echo those of many Spurs fans, who have grown increasingly frustrated with Levy’s leadership and the club’s lack of progress despite having talented players like Kane in their ranks.
While Levy’s track record in terms of managing the club’s finances has been widely acknowledged, Wright suggests that success on the pitch requires more than just financial stability. Tottenham need a manager and ownership structure that is dedicated to building a winning team, something that Wright feels Levy has failed to do despite having ample opportunities.
The managerial situation at Spurs has also been a point of contention. With manager Ange Postecoglou under pressure following the club’s poor run of results, many fans have questioned how much time he has before he is replaced. Some believe that Postecoglou, despite being a highly respected figure, may not be given the necessary resources and support to succeed at Tottenham, especially if the club’s ownership continues to prioritize financial stability over on-pitch success. Wright’s frustration stems from the feeling that Tottenham has not been able to maintain a consistent managerial structure or provide the stability needed for a long-term vision to succeed.
Postecoglou, who was brought in with the hope of bringing fresh ideas and a new playing style to the club, has yet to see his methods fully bear fruit. The team’s lack of success, compounded by their poor recent form, has led to increased speculation about his future. Some critics believe that Spurs should consider making a managerial change if they hope to turn things around, but Wright’s comments suggest that the problem lies higher up, with Levy’s inability to build a team capable of competing for trophies being the primary issue.
It’s important to note that Levy has presided over a period of significant change at Tottenham, including the construction of the club’s state-of-the-art stadium and a move toward a more commercial-focused approach. However, despite these achievements, the club’s lack of tangible success on the pitch has led to growing frustration. Tottenham have come close to winning silverware in recent years, notably finishing as runners-up in the 2019 Champions League final and reaching the FA Cup semifinals, but they have never been able to break through and secure a major trophy during Levy’s time as chairman.
The frustration surrounding Levy’s leadership is not limited to Wright and other pundits. Many Tottenham fans have expressed their dissatisfaction with the club’s direction and the perceived lack of ambition from the ownership. There is a sense that, despite having a world-class stadium and a lucrative commercial setup, Spurs have failed to capitalize on these assets to build a truly competitive team. The club’s continued failure to break into the top tier of English football, despite the financial resources at their disposal, has led to growing calls for change.
At the heart of the criticism is the belief that Levy’s priorities are misplaced. While it is undeniable that the club has made strides in terms of its business operations and commercial ventures, supporters argue that these achievements are meaningless without success on the pitch. Tottenham’s inability to win a trophy in over 15 years has left fans questioning the long-term vision of the club under Levy’s stewardship. Many feel that the club’s ownership structure is too focused on financial gain rather than sporting success, which has led to a sense of stagnation and frustration among supporters.
Wright’s comments reflect the broader dissatisfaction felt by many Tottenham fans, who believe that the club will continue to struggle unless there is a change at the top. While the managerial situation remains a topic of debate, the fundamental issue appears to be the lack of ambition and vision from the club’s ownership. Until Levy is willing to fully commit to building a team capable of competing for major honors, Tottenham’s struggles are likely to continue.
The question remains whether Levy will be willing to change his approach or whether he will continue to prioritize financial stability over success on the pitch. For now, it seems that Tottenham’s future will depend on whether they can make the necessary changes at both the ownership and managerial levels to turn their fortunes around. Until then, the frustration surrounding the club’s lack of success under Levy’s leadership is unlikely to subside.
