Premier League Fans had their say on semi-automated offsides following first use in Man City vs Crystal Palace

The beautiful game of football, a global spectacle captivating billions with its intricate ballet of athleticism, strategy, and passion, is perpetually in a state of evolution. From tactical innovations to advancements in player conditioning, the sport continuously seeks refinement in its pursuit of fairness and accuracy. In recent years, the implementation of technology has emerged as a pivotal force driving this evolution, particularly in the realm of officiating. Among the various technological aids introduced, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system has garnered significant attention, sparking both fervent support and considerable debate.1 A key area where VAR has been intensely scrutinized is the adjudication of offside decisions, often characterized by razor-thin margins and protracted reviews that can disrupt the flow of the game and incite frustration among players, coaches, and fans alike.
In response to these challenges, football’s governing bodies have sought more efficient and precise solutions, culminating in the development and implementation of semi-automated offside technology (SAOT).3 This innovative system, leveraging sophisticated camera technology and intricate data analysis, promises to revolutionize the offside decision-making process, enhancing speed, accuracy, and consistency.4 This comprehensive analysis will delve into the intricacies of SAOT, examining its functionality, its recent introduction into the Premier League, the immediate reactions and implications, and the broader context of technological integration within football. Furthermore, we will explore the reasons behind its “semi-automated” nature, the potential future trajectory of offside technology, and its impact on the overall landscape of the sport.
The quest for technological assistance in officiating football matches is not a recent phenomenon. Goal-line technology, successfully implemented to eliminate controversies surrounding whether the ball has crossed the goal line, served as a precedent for further integration of technology. The introduction of VAR marked a more ambitious step, aiming to provide video assistance to on-field referees in four key match-changing situations: goals, penalties, direct red card incidents, and cases of mistaken identity. However, the application of VAR to offside decisions quickly became a focal point of contention.
The traditional method of manually drawing lines on broadcast footage to determine offside positions proved to be time-consuming, susceptible to human error in identifying the precise moment of the ball being played (the “kick-point”) and the relevant body parts of the attacking and defending players, and often led to subjective interpretations of marginal situations. The delays associated with these reviews frequently disrupted the momentum of the game, and the prceived inconsistencies in decision-making eroded the confidence of some stakeholders in the VAR system.
Recognizing these limitations, FIFA and other football governing bodies embarked on the development of more advanced technologies to streamline and enhance the accuracy of offside calls.6 This endeavor culminated in the creation of semi-automated offside technology, which aims to automate the more objective aspects of the offside assessment, leaving the more subjective elements to the judgment of the VAR.
SAOT represents a significant leap forward in the technological analysis of football matches. The system relies on a network of specialized cameras strategically positioned around the stadium.8 In the Premier League implementation, up to 30 high-frame-rate cameras, capturing footage at 100 frames per second – double the rate of standard broadcast cameras – are utilized.9 These cameras meticulously track the movement of both the ball and the players on the field.
The core innovation of SAOT lies in its ability to generate precise skeletal tracking data for each player. The system identifies and tracks up to 29 data points on each player’s body, creating a virtual “skeleton” or “mesh” of their position on the field. This allows the technology to pinpoint the exact location of relevant body parts involved in offside assessments, such as the feet and torso. Simultaneously, the system tracks the precise moment the ball is played by the attacking player.
The data captured by the cameras and the player tracking system is then processed by sophisticated SAOT software.11 This software automatically analyzes the positions of the attacking and defending players relative to the ball at the moment it is played.12 If an attacking player is deemed to be in an offside position according to the laws of the game, the system automatically generates an offside alert, “flagging” the incident to the VAR and the SAOT operator in the video operations room.13 The system also generates virtual offside lines and three-dimensional visualizations that can be used by the VAR to quickly and accurately assess the situation.14 These graphics can also be displayed on broadcast to provide clarity for viewers.
Despite the advanced automation involved in SAOT, it is crucial to understand why the technology is termed “semi-automated” rather than fully automated. The Premier League explicitly states that human input remains a vital component of the decision-making process. The VAR is still required to confirm several key aspects of the SAOT output.
Firstly, the VAR must verify that the SAOT system has accurately identified the “kick-point” – the precise moment the ball leaves the foot or head of the player making the pass. Even with high-frame-rate cameras, there can be marginal instances where human judgment is needed to ensure the correct frame is selected.
Secondly, the VAR must confirm that the SAOT system has correctly identified the relevant attacking and defending players and the specific parts of their bodies that are being used for the offside assessment (typically the feet and torso). While the skeletal tracking is highly accurate, the VAR provides a crucial layer of verification.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the VAR retains the responsibility for evaluating “subjective” offside situations. The laws of the game stipulate that a player in an offside position can be penalized if they are deemed to be “interfering with play” or “interfering with an opponent.”15 These situations often involve subjective interpretations of a player’s actions, such as obstructing an opponent’s line of sight or making a movement that impacts an opponent’s ability to play the ball, even if the offside player does not directly touch the ball.16 SAOT can identify the offside position, but it cannot determine whether a player’s actions constitute interference.17 This crucial judgment remains within the purview of the VAR, potentially requiring an on-field review by the referee.
Therefore, SAOT serves as a powerful tool to provide objective data and visualizations, significantly speeding up the process of identifying potential offside situations.18 However, the final decision rests with the VAR, who must integrate the technological output with their understanding of the laws of the game and the nuances of each specific situation.
The Premier League officially introduced semi-automated offside technology in gameweek 32 of the 2024-2025 season, with the early kick-off match between Manchester City and Crystal Palace at the Etihad Stadium on Saturday, April 12, 2025, marking its debut in the English top flight.19 This implementation followed extensive non-live testing within the Premier League and live operation during several FA Cup matches earlier in the season, allowing officials and technology providers to refine the system and ensure its readiness for league competition.20
The Premier League’s decision to adopt SAOT aligns with similar implementations in other major European leagues, including Serie A and La Liga, as well as its successful use during the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar and the UEFA Champions League.21 The anticipation surrounding its introduction in the Premier League was high, with hopes that it would address the criticisms leveled against the previous VAR offside review process.
The technology was put to the test early in the Manchester City vs. Crystal Palace match when Crystal Palace took the lead through Eberechi Eze in the ninth minute. During the build-up to the goal, Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola protested that Crystal Palace’s Ismaila Sarr may have been in an offside position. However, after a swift check utilizing the newly implemented SAOT, the goal was allowed to stand.
The immediate reactions from fans on social media, as highlighted in the provided text, were largely positive. Several fans lauded the speed and efficiency of the decision-making process. Comments such as “You see how quick and efficient semi-automated offside calls are? It’s about time semi automated offside has been brought in, instead of them drawing lines,” and “Tight offside checked within 10 seconds instead of 5 minutes, football might be back,” underscore the perceived improvement in the timeliness of offside reviews. One fan noted, “Semi-automated worked well – quick decision,” indicating a positive initial impression of the technology’s effectiveness.
However, one fan raised a valid point regarding the transparency of the system, stating, “I’m all for the semi-automated offside technology but they actually need to show the decisions. First Palace goal was 25 minutes ago and still no sign of the decision graphics.” This highlights the importance of providing clear visual information to fans in the stadium and those watching at home to enhance their understanding and acceptance of the decisions made using SAOT. The Premier League’s statement prior to the implementation did mention the generation of “virtual graphics to ensure an enhanced in-stadium and broadcast experience for fans,” suggesting that efforts will be made to address this aspect.2
The introduction of semi-automated offside technology has the potential to bring about several significant changes to the landscape of football:
- Increased Accuracy: The precise tracking of player positions and the ball, coupled with automated analysis, is expected to lead to more accurate offside decisions, reducing the margin for human error associated with manual line drawing.
- Enhanced Speed and Efficiency: The automation of key elements of the offside assessment significantly reduces the time required for VAR reviews, minimizing disruptions to the flow of the game and enhancing the overall viewing experience.23
- Improved Consistency: By standardizing the process of identifying offside positions through technological analysis, SAOT aims to promote greater consistency in decision-making across different matches and competitions.24
- Increased Transparency (Potential): The generation of virtual offside lines and 3D visualizations offers the potential for greater transparency in the decision-making process, allowing fans to better understand the basis for offside calls, provided these graphics are consistently and promptly displayed.25
- Reduced Controversy: While offside decisions will likely remain a topic of discussion, the increased accuracy and speed afforded by SAOT could potentially reduce the level of intense controversy surrounding marginal calls.
- Impact on Tactics: Over time, the increased accuracy in offside detection might subtly influence attacking and defensive tactics, as teams adapt to the more precise application of the offside rule.
While semi-automated offside technology represents a significant advancement, the evolution of technology in football is likely to continue. The pursuit of even greater accuracy and efficiency may lead to further refinements of SAOT or the development of fully automated systems in the future.
One potential area of development could be the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in the subjective aspects of offside, such as determining interference with play. However, the nuanced nature of these judgments, often involving interpretations of player intent and movement, presents a significant challenge for full automation.
Another area of focus could be on enhancing the real-time visualization of offside decisions for fans, ensuring that the technological output is seamlessly integrated into broadcasts and stadium displays to provide immediate clarity.
The introduction of semi-automated offside technology into the Premier League marks a significant step forward in the ongoing quest for greater accuracy and efficiency in football officiating. The initial reactions from fans following its debut in the Manchester City vs. Crystal Palace match suggest a positive reception, with the speed of the decision-making process being particularly lauded.
SAOT’s ability to precisely track player movements and the ball, coupled with automated analysis, promises to reduce the delays and controversies that have often plagued VAR offside reviews.26 However, the “semi-automated” nature of the technology underscores the continued importance of human oversight and judgment, particularly in subjective offside scenarios.
As SAOT becomes more established in the Premier League and potentially other competitions, its impact on the game – from the flow of matches to tactical considerations – will become clearer. While challenges such as ensuring transparency in the presentation of technological data to fans remain, semi-automated offside technology represents a positive evolution in the integration of technology into football, striving to enhance fairness and accuracy in the beautiful game. The journey of technological advancement in football officiating is far from over, and SAOT serves as a crucial milestone in this ongoing pursuit of perfection.