Pep Guardiola considering to sign for rangers as danny rohl Official replacement confirmed

Rangers have once again become one of the most talked-about clubs in Scotland, not just because of what is happening on the pitch, but because of the major decisions being made behind the scenes about the future of their squad, especially in attack, where changes are now beginning to reshape the entire direction of the team.
The latest development involves a major transfer shift in the forward line, with Lawrence Shankland arriving at the club on a free transfer after an impressive season with Hearts. On paper, this looks like a smart piece of business, bringing in one of the most consistent goal scorers in the Scottish Premiership without a transfer fee. However, as with most big club decisions, this move has created ripple effects across the squad, and one of the biggest talking points now surrounds Bojan Miovski and what his future at Ibrox looks like.
Miovski arrived at Rangers last summer with high expectations. The club paid around £4.2 million to secure his signature after his strong performances at Aberdeen, where he built a reputation as a reliable, clinical striker capable of scoring in important moments. At the time, many believed Rangers had signed a long-term attacking solution, someone who could lead the line for years and provide consistency in front of goal.
But football rarely follows the expected path.
Since moving to Glasgow, Miovski has struggled to fully settle into life at Rangers. While he has still managed to score 13 goals in all competitions last season, those numbers do not tell the full story. His performances have often been inconsistent, and he has not been able to recreate the same level of influence he once had at Aberdeen. For a club with high ambitions and constant pressure to win trophies, consistency matters just as much as raw numbers.
The arrival of Shankland has now changed everything.
Shankland comes into Rangers after another strong season, where he scored 20 goals for Hearts and played a crucial role in their campaign. His finishing ability, leadership, and experience in Scottish football make him an immediate option for the starting lineup. More importantly, he arrives with confidence and momentum, two qualities that are essential for any striker joining a big club like Rangers.
With Shankland now in the squad, the competition for attacking places has become extremely intense. Reports suggest that Miovski could now find himself lower in the pecking order, behind not only Shankland but also other attacking options such as Youssef Chermiti and Ryan Naderi. This situation has raised serious questions about whether he still has a future at the club.
Former Aberdeen chief executive Keith Wyness has already suggested that Miovski may be the player most at risk following this transfer development. Speaking about the situation, he highlighted that Miovski has not managed to meet expectations since his move to Ibrox, and that the arrival of Shankland could push him even further down the list of preferred attacking options.
According to this view, the attacking partnership that Rangers may now focus on could be Shankland alongside Chermiti, a combination that blends experience with physical presence and movement. In that scenario, Miovski becomes the odd one out, a player without a clear role in the manager’s tactical plans.
This is where the situation becomes complicated for Rangers.
On one hand, the club is clearly trying to strengthen its squad with proven goal scorers. Shankland’s arrival on a free transfer is widely seen as excellent business, especially considering his goal record and leadership qualities. For a club competing for titles, signing a striker who already understands the league is a major advantage.
On the other hand, Rangers must now deal with the consequences of having too many players competing for too few attacking positions. Football squads need balance, and when a player is not getting regular minutes, it becomes difficult for both the club and the individual.
Miovski’s situation is now uncertain. A £4.2 million signing is not an easy player to move on from, especially after just one season. Clubs do not like to admit mistakes in the transfer market, but sometimes football forces difficult decisions. If a player is not fitting into the system or not performing at the expected level, changes eventually become unavoidable.
However, there is also a more balanced view being discussed.
Some former players and analysts believe that Rangers should not rush into selling Miovski. Instead, they argue that the striker still has value, especially based on what he previously showed at Aberdeen. He is still relatively young, still developing, and still capable of becoming a consistent scorer in the right environment.
One suggestion that has gained attention is a possible loan move, with Hearts being mentioned as a potential destination. The idea is that Miovski could return to regular football in a familiar environment, rebuild his confidence, and rediscover his form. At the same time, Rangers would not lose a valuable asset permanently and could reassess his future later.
From Hearts’ perspective, a move like this could also make sense. They already know his quality, and bringing him back even temporarily could help replace the goals they will lose following Shankland’s departure. It becomes a situation where all three sides could potentially benefit: Rangers manage their squad better, Hearts regain a proven striker, and Miovski gets the minutes he needs.
But football decisions are rarely that simple.
Rangers must also consider the financial side of any potential move. Even if Shankland arrived on a free transfer, there may still be clauses or long-term financial commitments involved in the wider structure of deals with Hearts. These kinds of arrangements are common in modern football transfers and can influence future decisions about squad building.
Manager Danny Rohl has already publicly welcomed Shankland, praising his leadership, professionalism, and proven goal record in Scottish football. That kind of endorsement shows that the striker is expected to play an important role immediately. When a manager speaks so positively about a new signing, it usually indicates that the player is part of the main tactical plan going forward.
And that leads back to the central question facing Rangers right now.
What should they do with Bojan Miovski?
From a purely sporting perspective, the club must think about performance, efficiency, and squad harmony. Keeping an unhappy player who is not getting enough minutes can sometimes create more problems than solutions. On the other hand, selling a player too early, especially one with proven ability in the league, can come back to haunt a club if he regains form elsewhere.
This is why the decision is so difficult.
Rangers are clearly trying to build a forward line that is more clinical, more experienced, and more consistent in front of goal. Shankland fits that profile. Chermiti offers another dimension. Naderi provides additional depth. But in that structure, Miovski appears to be the player most at risk of losing his place.
For the player himself, this is a crucial moment in his career. After a difficult season at Ibrox, he must now fight either to reclaim his position or consider a move that gives him regular football again. Strikers rely heavily on confidence, rhythm, and consistent minutes. Without those, even talented forwards can struggle to make an impact.
The coming weeks will likely determine his future.
Rangers must decide whether to persist with him as part of their squad rotation or allow him to leave, either permanently or temporarily. It is a decision that will not only affect this season but could also shape their long-term attacking structure.
What is clear, however, is that the arrival of Lawrence Shankland has changed everything. It has raised competition, shifted expectations, and forced difficult conversations about who stays and who goes.
And in football, when competition increases at a big club, not everyone survives the reshuffle.
Rangers are now at that point again, where ambition and reality meet, and tough decisions must be made for the future of the team.
:::









