No one is talking about how bad the new Skov Olsen has been for Rangers

Drop him today: No one is talking about how bad the new Skov Olsen has been for Rangers – opinion
Rangers supporters have every reason to demand more from their team, especially when the club is expected to challenge for major honours and compete consistently at the highest level of Scottish football. Every new signing arrives with expectations, but those expectations mean very little if the performances on the pitch fail to match the excitement surrounding the arrival. That is why the discussion surrounding the new Skov Olsen deserves serious attention.
The question is whether Rangers are getting the contribution they expected from a player who was supposed to bring something important to the team. Supporters can be patient when a new arrival needs time to settle, but patience should never mean ignoring performances that require improvement. At a club where every dropped point can affect the season, the manager must be prepared to make difficult decisions.
The argument for dropping him is straightforward: nobody should be guaranteed a place in the Rangers starting eleven simply because of his reputation or the excitement surrounding his arrival. If another player is better prepared to contribute, that alternative deserves an opportunity.
This is not about permanently writing off a player after a difficult period. It is about setting the right standards and making sure that Rangers select their team based on performances rather than expectations.
A club with Rangers’ ambitions cannot afford to allow reputations to become more important than results. If Skov Olsen is struggling to make the desired impact, the manager needs to examine the situation honestly and decide what is best for the team.
The debate should focus on his actual contribution, the tactical role he has been given, and whether another option could improve the team’s attacking performance. Those are the issues that matter most.
Ultimately, Rangers need players who can deliver when the pressure is highest. If Skov Olsen is not currently meeting the required standard, dropping him could be the right decision. A place on the bench might give him an opportunity to regroup while allowing another player to demonstrate what he can offer.
The message should be clear: no player is bigger than Rangers, and every starting position must be earned. If Skov Olsen can respond positively, he should have the opportunity to win his place back. If not, the manager must be willing to explore other options.
For Rangers supporters, the priority is simple. They want a team that performs consistently, competes with determination, and gives itself the best possible chance of winning. Every selection decision should serve that objective







